Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Outings with Babies

Last week, the babies and I met a friend of mine for coffee. They are at the age where they are often perfectly content to sit in the stroller for an hour or so, looking around, chewing on a rubber giraffe toy and occasionally making little noises of contentment or surprise while I go about my business. I'm enjoying this stage while I can. As my friend and I chatted, we were interrupted intermittently by passersby who would make faces at the babies, or elbow friends to say "Look, twins!"

At one point, my friend, who doesn't have kids, commented that bringing twins out in public must be like bringing a really exotic dog to a dog park. He immediately apologized, fearing that he had somehow trivialized the experience of fatherhood, but I told him there was no need, that his analogy was completely accurate.

When I take the twins out in public, I never mind the attention in the slightest. To tell the truth, I eat it up. As someone who generally keeps a pretty low profile when I go out, I sometimes wonder what life would be like as a recognizable celebrity, constantly being bombarded with autograph and photo requests. I suppose it must get invasive after a while - you always hear celebrities complaining about it - but it must be fun for at least the first week, or the first month, right? Granted, the paparazzi hasn't started stalking my babies and me just yet, but for now, it's fun to be a source of fleeting interest, curiosity and maybe even admiration. And yes, I realize that the babies are the ones who are garnering the attention and that it's not really about me. But still, it makes me feel like Super Dad for moment here and there. I feel like it's good manners to shrink away from the attention, rather than leaning into it, or maybe to complain about the constant comments and questions from strangers. But if there is anything more pathetic than openly craving attention, it's pretending not crave it, even though you obviously do. You end up coming off like Michael Scott, fishing for a "Happy Birthday" from Jan:


It's a pain to take the babies out in the hot weather: they require sunscreen and sometimes little white hats and sunglasses (which they don't always love), and these damp blankets to keep them cool. It's a lot of work for an outing that probably won't exceed an hour in duration. So we've ended up spending a lot of time at indoor spots, most of which aren't terribly interesting, like Giant and the Towson Mall (which I kind of hate). A few observations about the attention we receive there:
  • Twins will always attract their share of interested observers, but it's even more of a novelty to see a dad with twins. It's a double-standard, really, the idea that if Mom takes the babies she is just doing her job, but if Dad takes them, well, he's a super-hero. But it's a double-standard that works in my favor, so...
  • Frequent questions include: "How old are they?" "What are their names?" "Are they a boy and a girl?" A trickier one is, "Do twins run in your family?" This is a completely reasonable question in and of itself, and actually the answer is yes: both Maya and I have first cousins who are twins. But sometimes, we've gotten the distinct impression that this question is code for "Did you have the babies naturally or artificially?" Maybe we're just paranoid.
  • Then there was the lady at Giant who asked me straight up, "Are they natural twins?" I was too stunned to do anything but stammer. I regret not telling her off, though. Who asks that?
  • A big one is "Are they identical or fraternal" Or more often, "Are they identical or... the other one?" This is kind of a surprising question to me. I've known for a long time that identical twins must necessarily have the same sex, but apparently this knowledge is not as common as I assumed. I was especially surprised when a student at my school, a twin himself, asked me this question. I thought that was a basic piece of knowledge you needed in order to consider yourself a twin.
  • Not every place attracts the same number of people who are interested in babies. In my experience so far, we get the most attention when we go to food-related places: Giant, R House (an upscale indoor food court) and especially the Market at Shrewsbury (a giant indoor market and food court in PA). People seem generally less interested in shopping malls and department stores, like Target. I still haven't worked out the possible reasons for the difference, but it is distinct.
  • I can be weirdly and unfairly resentful when strangers don't acknowledge my twins. The other day I was in an elevator with the stroller when a young man came in, pressed his floor number and then obliviously pulled out his phone. I found myself thinking, "Aren't you going to say anything?" I know its irrational, but I can't help it.
I've done this multiple times.

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Incredible Catch

"Wow, that was an incredible catch!"

"Unbelievable!"

"Holy Crap! How did he do that?"

These are really the only appropriate responses to the catch that Austin Jackson made in center field at Fenway Park last night. A little context: in the fifth inning of last night's Red Sox-Indians game, with the Indians leading 7-5, the Sox' Hanley Ramirez hit a ball to the "triangle," the deepest part of center field. The Indians' Austin Jackson extended his glove and leaped into the air to make an insane catch against the Red Sox' bullpen. He crashed into the low wall and his momentum brought him down into the bullpen, where he actually made a rather smooth landing. If you haven't already seen this play, please help yourself. It's worth multiple viewings.




"That just might be the play of the year!" says a stunned Indians' announcer, and honestly it's really hard to argue the point. I've seen lots of Red Sox games and I can remember a couple instances where a player tried and failed to make a similar catch: Torii Hunter famously attempted it in the 2013 play-offs. But Jackson succeeded, and he looked good doing it too. Watch him emerge from the bullpen and flip the ball back to the infield: he appears more energized than rattled.

And that really should be the end of the story. But this morning I saw the highlight again on my Facebook feed, where MLB had posted it. I made the mistake of clicking on the comments. And wow. Here are the top five:

Ricky Flores That shud be a homerun!
Ball went over wall!
Fk that!

Reply
166
11 hrs
Adam Boizelle Should be a homerun. Ball went over the fence with the player. If a player catches a ball in foul territory and his entire body falls into foul territory, it should be a foul ball.

Reply
45
11 hrs
Tom Galliher Jackie Bradley Jr's catch on Judge in the same bullpen 2 weeks ago was better.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply
44
11 hrs
Tom Daniels Uhh. The whole point is to keep the ball from going out of the park. Not a catch.

Reply
39
11 hrs
Mike Vi that's a incredible catch, impressive even, still F$ck the Tribe - Red Sox fan 🤔🙄🤚🏽

Reply
29
11 hrs
Again, I want to reiterate that the only appropriate responses to this video should be expressions of disbelief or admiration. These are almost nowhere to be seen here. Instead, we have 1) a petty and incorrect challenge of the rules, 2) a defense of the rules that maintains a fairly neutral tone, 3) a weirdly defensive reference to an entirely different catch, 4) another petty and incorrect challenge of the rules, and 5) a mild expression of praise undercut by an insult.

Yes, I understand that the internet is basically an endless font of negativity and a showcase for the worst of all human impulses. And I understand that it's probably pointless to express disappointment when my low expectations are validated. And what am I doing clicking on internet comments anyway, when I know full well they are probably going to depress me?

But come on. Does every comment have to be so overwhelmingly negative and cynical? For crying out loud, this isn't some Alt-right blog post - it's a video of a baseball player making an unbelievable catch. Why can't we just shut up and enjoy it? Why do we have to criticize and undermine and insult? What is this proving?

To be fair, when Jackson made his catch last night, the Red Sox faithful cheered him. They are a notoriously hostile bunch, but they know greatness when they see it. It's heartening to know that many fans - the ones who attend games anyway - haven't lost the capacity to be thrilled and amazed. Once you lose that, what's the point in even watching sports?